<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!--RSS generated by Flaimo.com RSS Builder [2026-04-24 14:15:17]-->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"><channel><docs>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/</docs><link>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/</link><description><![CDATA[Rocky Linux BugTracker - Issues]]></description><title>Rocky Linux BugTracker - Issues</title><language>en</language><category>All Projects</category><ttl>10</ttl><dc:language>en</dc:language><sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod><sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency><item><title>0012575: postgis package is available in appstream, whereas in RHEL 9 it is only available in the postgresql:16 module</title><author></author><link>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12575</link><description><![CDATA[RHEL 9.7 added the postgis package, but it is supported only in the postgresql:16 module stream.  It is not available in &quot;appstream&quot;.  In Rocky Linux 9.7 it is available as a module package as well as in a non-modular version.  This forms an incompatibility with upstream.  The non-modular package shall be removed.]]></description><category>postgresql</category><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 14:02:14 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12575</guid><comments>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12575#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>0012574: category "postgis" missing for Rocky Linux 9</title><author></author><link>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12574</link><description><![CDATA[The BugTracker does not have the &quot;postgis&quot; category for Rocky Linux 9 (postgis is a new package since 9.7).  It should be added.]]></description><category>BugTracker</category><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 13:50:16 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12574</guid><comments>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12574#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>0012541: Rocky Linux 9 "extras" repo failing repo GPG signature check</title><author></author><link>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12541</link><description><![CDATA[Problem&lt;br /&gt;
All Rocky Linux 9.7 servers fail dnf update with:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Error: Failed to download metadata for repo 'extras': repomd.xml GPG signature verification error: Bad GPG signature&lt;br /&gt;
Troubleshooting Steps Performed&lt;br /&gt;
Verified the local GPG key (0x350D275D) matches the official Rocky Linux 9 release key — fingerprint 21CB 256A E16F C54C 6E65 2949 702D 426D 350D 275D is correct.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ran dnf clean all, dnf makecache, dnf update — no change.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Re-downloaded and re-imported the GPG key from /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-Rocky-9 — no change.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Switched the extras repo from mirrorlist to the base URL (dl.rockylinux.org) — no change.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Attempted dnf --disablerepo extras update — other repos updated successfully, confirming the issue is isolated to extras.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reviewed the known Rocky Linux forum thread (GPG Signature Verification Fails - Rocky Linux 9 BaseOS) — that fix (March 24, 2026) resolved BaseOS/AppStream but not extras.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Definitive test: Downloaded repomd.xml and repomd.xml.asc directly from Rocky’s official repo and verified locally with GPG:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
curl -so /tmp/repomd.xml &lt;a href=&quot;http://dl.rockylinux.org/pub/rocky/9/extras/x86_64/os/repodata/repomd.xml&quot; rel=&quot;noopener&quot;&gt;http://dl.rockylinux.org/pub/rocky/9/extras/x86_64/os/repodata/repomd.xml&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
curl -so /tmp/repomd.xml.asc &lt;a href=&quot;http://dl.rockylinux.org/pub/rocky/9/extras/x86_64/os/repodata/repomd.xml.asc&quot; rel=&quot;noopener&quot;&gt;http://dl.rockylinux.org/pub/rocky/9/extras/x86_64/os/repodata/repomd.xml.asc&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
gpg --import /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-Rocky-9&lt;br /&gt;
gpg --verify /tmp/repomd.xml.asc /tmp/repomd.xml&lt;br /&gt;
Result:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
gpg: Signature made Tue 21 Apr 2026 05:32:46 AM CDT&lt;br /&gt;
gpg:                using RSA key 21CB256AE16FC54C6E652949702D426D350D275D&lt;br /&gt;
gpg: BAD signature from &quot;Rocky Enterprise Software Foundation - Release key 2022 &lt;&lt;a href=&quot;mailto:releng@rockylinux.org&quot;&gt;releng@rockylinux.org&lt;/a&gt;&gt;&quot; [unknown]&lt;br /&gt;
Root Cause&lt;br /&gt;
Server-side issue at Rocky Linux. The repomd.xml file in the extras repo (dl.rockylinux.org/pub/rocky/9/extras/x86_64/os/repodata/) is out of sync with its detached signature (repomd.xml.asc). The metadata was updated without regenerating the signature, or vice versa. The signing key is correct — the content simply doesn’t match what was signed. This is not a local key or configuration problem.]]></description><category>[Repo] Extras</category><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 09:18:57 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12541</guid><comments>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12541#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>0012508: mdadm-4.4-4.el9_7 fails to assemble arrays: "Can't open /sys/module/md_mod/parameters/legacy_async_del_gendisk"</title><author></author><link>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12508</link><description><![CDATA[Description:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Server was last booted +/- 90 days ago.  No problems at that time.&lt;br /&gt;
Suspect after the mdadm-4.4-4.el9_7 update (installed 2026-04-11), mdadm --assemble --scan (and automatic boot assembly) fails with:&lt;br /&gt;
mdadm: Can't open /sys/module/md_mod/parameters/legacy_async_del_gendisk&lt;br /&gt;
mdadm: init md module parameters fail&lt;br /&gt;
mdadm: No arrays found in config file or automatically&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Affected systems:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rocky Linux 9.7 (Blue Onyx) per /etc/rocky-release&lt;br /&gt;
Kernel: 5.14.0-570.32.1.el9_6.x86_64 (Rocky 9.6 kernel series)&lt;br /&gt;
mdadm: 4.4-4.el9_7.x86_64&lt;br /&gt;
RAID: RAID10 (near=2, 256K chunks) built on 4× partitions (/dev/sda1–/dev/sdd1)&lt;br /&gt;
LVM on top of /dev/md0]]></description><category>mdadm</category><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 00:27:27 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12508</guid><comments>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12508#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>0012475: scap-security-guide-0.1.80-1.el9_7.rocky.1.1 RPM missing /usr/share/xml/scap/ssg/content/ssg-rl9-ds.xml File</title><author></author><link>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12475</link><description><![CDATA[Description of problem:&lt;br /&gt;
The new scap-security-guide RPM no longer contains the /usr/share/xml/scap/ssg/content/ssg-rl9-ds.xml file which breaks the add-on for rocky linux.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SCAP Security Guide Version:&lt;br /&gt;
0.1.80-1.el9_7&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Operating System Version:&lt;br /&gt;
Rocky 9.7&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Steps to Reproduce:&lt;br /&gt;
1.Download scap-security-guide RPM v80&lt;br /&gt;
2. utilize add-on in Rocky kickstart&lt;br /&gt;
3. kickstart fails because file doesn't exist&lt;br /&gt;
4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Actual Results:&lt;br /&gt;
kickstart fails because the file doesn't exist&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Expected Results:&lt;br /&gt;
add-on runs like it always has]]></description><category>scap-security-guide</category><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 21:04:18 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12475</guid><comments>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12475#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>0012443: tesseract fails to compile when mingw is installed</title><author></author><link>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12443</link><description><![CDATA[tesseract package fails to compile, when rpmbuild variable %{mingw_debug_package} is defined,&lt;br /&gt;
which is provided by mingw-filesystem-base-148-7.el10.v1.noarch package.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2026-04-14 19:42:41 RPM build errors:&lt;br /&gt;
2026-04-14 19:42:41     Could not open %files file /home/kabe/r10builds/tesseract-r10/BUILD/tesseract-5.3.4/mingw32-debugfiles.list: No such file or directory&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
koji builds seems to not suffer since they do not pull in mingw packages firsthand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I tried to report this to bugzilla.redhat.com, but the do not have RHEL category. Reporting it here.]]></description><category>tesseract</category><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 11:56:09 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12443</guid><comments>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12443#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>0012442: leptonica fails to compile when mingw is installed</title><author></author><link>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12442</link><description><![CDATA[leptonica fails to compile when RPM variable %{mingw_debug_package} is defined,&lt;br /&gt;
that is, defined in /usr/lib/rpm/macros.d/macros.mingw, which is provided by mingw-filesystem-base-148-7.el10.noarch package.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
koji build seems to not suffer since it does not pull in the mingw packages firsthand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I tried to report this to bugzilla.redhat.com, but it lacks category RHEL, hence reporting here.]]></description><category>leptonica</category><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 11:45:52 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12442</guid><comments>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12442#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>0012409: AMD EPYC 9535 Fails to boot Rocky 9.7 due to microcode update failing</title><author></author><link>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12409</link><description><![CDATA[System cannot boot Rocky 9.7 due to microcode update failing but worked fine using 9.6.  Using dis_ucode_ldr in kernel arguments fixes issue on 9.7.  Both an update from 9.6 to 9.7 and a fresh 9.7 install were attempted.]]></description><category>microcode_ctl</category><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 19:24:17 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12409</guid><comments>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12409#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>0012376: security_policyvers() returns 33 but only policy.35 exists on disk</title><author></author><link>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12376</link><description><![CDATA[## Environment&lt;br /&gt;
  - Rocky Linux 10.1&lt;br /&gt;
  - libsepol-3.9-1.el10.x86_64&lt;br /&gt;
  - sestatus: Max kernel policy version: 33&lt;br /&gt;
  - Only policy.35 exists under /etc/selinux/targeted/policy/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  ## Problem&lt;br /&gt;
  security_policyvers() returns 33, but no policy.33 file exists on disk. The only&lt;br /&gt;
  installed binary policy file is policy.35. Software that locates the binary policy&lt;br /&gt;
  by searching downward from security_policyvers() will never find it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  Confirmed: the internal binary version of policy.35 (read at offset 16 in the&lt;br /&gt;
  policydb) is 35. sestatus still reports &quot;Max kernel policy version: 33&quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  ## Root Cause&lt;br /&gt;
  Upstream libsepol defines POLICYDB_VERSION_MAX = 33. Rocky Linux 10.1 ships&lt;br /&gt;
  policy.35, which uses a downstream policy format version (35) not present in&lt;br /&gt;
  upstream libsepol. security_policyvers() reports the upstream ceiling (33),&lt;br /&gt;
  creating a mismatch with the actual on-disk file version.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  ## Suggested Fix&lt;br /&gt;
  Either:&lt;br /&gt;
  1. Ship policy.33 as a compatibility symlink to policy.35, or&lt;br /&gt;
  2. Update libsepol to expose POLICYDB_VERSION_MAX = 35 so that&lt;br /&gt;
     security_policyvers() reflects the actual on-disk policy version.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  ## Additional Notes&lt;br /&gt;
  - Rocky Linux 9.7 is unaffected: policy.33 on disk, internal version 33,&lt;br /&gt;
    matches security_policyvers().&lt;br /&gt;
  - Policy versions 34 and 35 do not appear in upstream libsepol source or&lt;br /&gt;
    changelog — they appear to be downstream extensions.]]></description><category>selinux-policy</category><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 19:05:05 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12376</guid><comments>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12376#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>0012344: AWS AMI support for AMD instances m8a, r8a, c8a</title><author></author><link>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12344</link><description><![CDATA[Rocky 9 and 10 AMIs on AWS don't seem to be available on the new AMD instance types m8a, r8a, c8a.&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry, not sure how to test this directly, but I guess it should work out of the box if enabled for the AMIs.&lt;br /&gt;
Many thanks for looking into this!]]></description><category>General</category><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 03:35:41 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12344</guid><comments>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12344#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>0012343: collectd write_riemann always crashing on Rocky 9.7</title><author></author><link>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12343</link><description><![CDATA[I'm getting stacktrace from collectd write_riemann plugin, which is using riemann-c-client, when collectd is trying to send metrics. I didn't have these issues before. Stacktrace details:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
```&lt;br /&gt;
Process 4729 (collectd) of user 0 dumped core.&lt;br /&gt;
  Stack trace of thread 4732:&lt;br /&gt;
  #0  0x00007f52f075d5bd __strlen_avx2 (libc.so.6 + 0x15d5bd)&lt;br /&gt;
  #1  0x00007f52f069c6c3 __strdup (libc.so.6 + 0x9c6c3)&lt;br /&gt;
  #2  0x00007f52f05f991c riemann_event_set_va (libriemann-client.so.0 + 0x591c)&lt;br /&gt;
  #3  0x00007f52f05f9e81 riemann_event_set (libriemann-client.so.0 + 0x5e81)&lt;br /&gt;
  #4  0x00007f52f0813f6c wrr_value_to_event (write_riemann.so + 0x2f6c)&lt;br /&gt;
  #5  0x00007f52f0814463 wrr_value_list_to_message (write_riemann.so + 0x3463)&lt;br /&gt;
  #6  0x00007f52f0814bc3 wrr_write (write_riemann.so + 0x3bc3)&lt;br /&gt;
  #7  0x000055a706ee4b9e plugin_write (collectd + 0x10b9e)&lt;br /&gt;
  #8  0x000055a706ee6d85 fc_bit_write_invoke.lto_priv.0 (collectd + 0x12d85)&lt;br /&gt;
  #9  0x000055a706ef23ff plugin_dispatch_values_internal.isra.0 (collectd + 0x1e3ff)&lt;br /&gt;
  #10 0x000055a706ee01f7 plugin_write_thread (collectd + 0xc1f7)&lt;br /&gt;
  #11 0x00007f52f068a19a start_thread (libc.so.6 + 0x8a19a)&lt;br /&gt;
  #12 0x00007f52f070f210 __clone3 (libc.so.6 + 0x10f210)&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
  Stack trace of thread 4738:&lt;br /&gt;
  #0  0x00007f52f068ef6a __GI___pthread_mutex_unlock_usercnt (libc.so.6 + 0x8ef6a)&lt;br /&gt;
  #1  0x000055a706ee1264 plugin_write_enqueue (collectd + 0xd264)&lt;br /&gt;
  #2  0x000055a706ee1817 plugin_dispatch_values (collectd + 0xd817)&lt;br /&gt;
  #3  0x00007f52f089f66f disk_submit (disk.so + 0x166f)&lt;br /&gt;
  #4  0x00007f52f08a00a4 disk_read (disk.so + 0x20a4)&lt;br /&gt;
  #5  0x000055a706ee44bc plugin_read_thread (collectd + 0x104bc)&lt;br /&gt;
  #6  0x00007f52f068a19a start_thread (libc.so.6 + 0x8a19a)&lt;br /&gt;
  #7  0x00007f52f070f210 __clone3 (libc.so.6 + 0x10f210)&lt;br /&gt;
```&lt;br /&gt;
I've reported this to riemann-c-client maintaner (&lt;a href=&quot;https://git.madhouse-project.org/algernon/riemann-c-client/issues/17&quot; rel=&quot;noopener&quot;&gt;https://git.madhouse-project.org/algernon/riemann-c-client/issues/17&lt;/a&gt;) and he suspects it's something either due to collectd or packaging. However, I'm running collectd 5.12.0 and riemann-c-client 1.10.4 on Debian 13 without any issue&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, rieman-c-client might need update on Rocky as well.]]></description><category>General</category><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 16:33:05 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12343</guid><comments>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12343#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>0012180: Trusted Domain Authentication samba 4.22 Rocky 9.7</title><author></author><link>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12180</link><description><![CDATA[Samba 4.22.4-12.el9_7 doesn't seem to contain the regression anymore for CVE-2025-49716 netlogon hardening fix&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- **OS**: Rocky Linux 9.7 (Blue Onyx)&lt;br /&gt;
- **Samba Version**: samba-4.22.4-12.el9_7.x86_64&lt;br /&gt;
- **Configuration**: Domain member server joined to DOMAIN-A.COM with forest transitive trust to DOMAIN-B.COM&lt;br /&gt;
- **idmap backend**: ad (for DOMAIN-B), sss (for DOMAIN-A)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After upgrading from Rocky Linux 9.6 (samba-4.21.3-14.el9_6) to Rocky Linux 9.7 (samba-4.22.4-12.el9_7), NTLM challenge/response authentication fails for users from the trusted domain DOMAIN-B.COM with `NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD`. Plaintext authentication works correctly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[log.wb-DOMAIN-B] cm_connect_netlogon_transport: get_secure_channel_type gave SEC_CHAN_NULL for DOMAIN-B&lt;br /&gt;
[log.wb-DOMAIN-B] cli_rpc_pipe_open_noauth: opened pipe netlogon to machine DC01.domain-b.com and bound anonymously&lt;br /&gt;
[log.winbindd] lm_resp: DATA_BLOB length=0&lt;br /&gt;
[log.winbindd] nt_resp: DATA_BLOB length=0&lt;br /&gt;
[log.winbindd] result: NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No `netr_LogonSamLogon` calls found in logs - winbind not attempting netlogon authentication for trusted domain challenge/response.]]></description><category>samba</category><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 18:17:11 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12180</guid><comments>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12180#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>0012310: kernels &gt; 6.12.0-68.el10: data loss when using md raid1 with with writemostly flag</title><author></author><link>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12310</link><description><![CDATA[The current redhat kernels 6.12.0-124.40.1.el10_1 on EL10 and 5.14.0-611.36.1.el9_7 on EL9 contain a regression that leads to data-loss if a raid1 is configured with one disk flagged as writemostly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The regression was introduced by this linux kernel commit:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=8a0adf3d778c4a0893c6d34a9e1b0082a6f1c495&quot; rel=&quot;noopener&quot;&gt;https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=8a0adf3d778c4a0893c6d34a9e1b0082a6f1c495&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was backported to EL10 and EL9:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
EL10:&lt;br /&gt;
* Mon Mar 24 2025 Julio Faracco &lt;&lt;a href=&quot;mailto:jfaracco@redhat.com&quot;&gt;jfaracco@redhat.com&lt;/a&gt;&gt; [6.12.0-68.el10]&lt;br /&gt;
- md/raid1,raid10: don't ignore IO flags (Nigel Croxon) [RHEL-83951]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
EL9:&lt;br /&gt;
* Thu Mar 27 2025 Augusto Caringi &lt;&lt;a href=&quot;mailto:acaringi@redhat.com&quot;&gt;acaringi@redhat.com&lt;/a&gt;&gt; [5.14.0-576.el9]&lt;br /&gt;
- md/raid1,raid10: don't ignore IO flags (Nigel Croxon) [RHEL-83988]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The mainline kernel already contains a fix:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/743bf030947169c413a711f60cebe73f837e649f&quot; rel=&quot;noopener&quot;&gt;https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/743bf030947169c413a711f60cebe73f837e649f&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However this fix didn't make it into redhat kernels yet.]]></description><category>kernel</category><pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 14:53:36 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12310</guid><comments>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12310#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>0012211: SELinux regression in selinux-policy-42.1.7-1.el10_1.1 causes systemd AVC denial (init_t capability2 mac_admin) and breaks syste</title><author></author><link>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12211</link><description><![CDATA[After upgrading to selinux-policy-42.1.7-1.el10_1.1 on Rocky Linux 10.1, SELinux starts denying the mac_admin capability for systemd (init_t). This results in repeated AVC denials and causes system services to malfunction. In our environment this manifests as failures when managing services (for example via systemctl or automation tools such as Ansible).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Downgrading SELinux policy packages to 42.1.7-1.el10 resolves the issue immediately.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Working versions:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
selinux-policy-42.1.7-1.el10.noarch&lt;br /&gt;
selinux-policy-targeted-42.1.7-1.el10.noarch&lt;br /&gt;
systemd-257-13.el10.rocky.0.1.x86_64&lt;br /&gt;
dbus-broker-36-4.el10.x86_64&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Broken versions:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
selinux-policy-42.1.7-1.el10_1.1.noarch&lt;br /&gt;
selinux-policy-targeted-42.1.7-1.el10_1.1.noarch]]></description><category>selinux-policy</category><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 13:26:37 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12211</guid><comments>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12211#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>0012277: Legion Y9000P: AW88399 smart amp not working (driver not enabled, firmware missing, NVIDIA HDA conflict)</title><author></author><link>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12277</link><description><![CDATA[Hardware&lt;br /&gt;
Host: 83F4 (Legion Y9000P IAX10, 2025)&lt;br /&gt;
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 9 275HX (24) @ 5.40 GHz&lt;br /&gt;
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Max-Q / Mobile [Discrete]&lt;br /&gt;
GPU 2: Intel Graphics @ 1.90 GHz [Integrated]&lt;br /&gt;
OS: Rocky Linux 10.1 (Red Quartz) x86_64&lt;br /&gt;
Kernel: Linux 6.12.0-124.38.1.el10_1.x86_64&lt;br /&gt;
Audio Driver: snd_hda_intel / snd-hda-codec-realtek&lt;br /&gt;
NVIDIA info:&lt;br /&gt;
    pcp-pmda-nvidia-gpu-6.3.7-5.el10.x86_64&lt;br /&gt;
    xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-cuda-libs-580.95.05-1.el10.x86_64&lt;br /&gt;
    nvidia-modprobe-580.95.05-1.el10.x86_64&lt;br /&gt;
    xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-libs-580.95.05-1.el10.x86_64&lt;br /&gt;
    xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-kmodsrc-580.95.05-1.el10.x86_64&lt;br /&gt;
    nvidia-settings-580.95.05-1.el10.x86_64&lt;br /&gt;
    xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-power-580.95.05-1.el10.x86_64&lt;br /&gt;
    xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-580.95.05-1.el10.x86_64&lt;br /&gt;
    nvidia-persistenced-580.95.05-1.el10.x86_64&lt;br /&gt;
    xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-cuda-580.95.05-1.el10.x86_64&lt;br /&gt;
    kmod-nvidia-6.12.0-124.el10_1-580.95.05-1.el10.x86_64&lt;br /&gt;
    akmod-nvidia-580.95.05-1.el10.x86_64&lt;br /&gt;
    nvidia-gpu-firmware-20260130-19.3.el10_1.noarch&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Problem Symptoms&lt;br /&gt;
    Speaker output is sharp, tinny, distorted - completely unusable for normal audio.&lt;br /&gt;
    Headphone jack may work normally (needs confirmation).&lt;br /&gt;
    Kernel log continuously floods with spurious response errors.&lt;br /&gt;
    Both &quot;Speaker&quot; and &quot;Bass Speaker&quot; controls appear in ALSA, but bass speaker produces distorted sound.&lt;br /&gt;
    Root cause: AW88399 smart amplifier driver not present + firmware missing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Detail&lt;br /&gt;
Audio Components:&lt;br /&gt;
    Codec: Realtek ALC287 (hardware ID: 0x10ec0287)&lt;br /&gt;
    Marketing Name: Realtek ALC3306 (OEM rename by Lenovo, identical to ALC287)&lt;br /&gt;
    Subsystem ID: 0x17aa3906 (Lenovo Y9000P specific)&lt;br /&gt;
    Smart Amplifier: AWINIC AW88399 (confirmed by hardware design, but not detected in software)&lt;br /&gt;
    Speaker Configuration: 4-speaker system (2 full-range + 2 woofers/subwoofers)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reference:&lt;br /&gt;
    Kernel Bug 216299 (&lt;a href=&quot;https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216299&quot; rel=&quot;noopener&quot;&gt;https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216299&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br /&gt;
    A solution for 6.18/6.19 (&lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/nadimkobeissi/16iax10h-linux-sound-saga&quot; rel=&quot;noopener&quot;&gt;https://github.com/nadimkobeissi/16iax10h-linux-sound-saga&lt;/a&gt;)]]></description><category>kernel</category><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 05:26:03 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12277</guid><comments>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12277#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>0012245: dracut not detecting IMSM Intel Matrix FakeRAID Metadata Properly - RAID Array not assembling - /dev/rl_nv/root does not exist</title><author></author><link>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12245</link><description><![CDATA[In the latest version of Rocky Linux 9 (up-to-date with all packages via yum), complex Intel Matrix RAID (IMSM/DDF) setups often fail to assemble during early boot, dropping users into the dracut emergency shell.  This happens on a Dell C1100 CS24-TY 1U server using Intel Matrix FakeRAID 10 with two different sized RAID arrays setup via the BIOS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is a recent change, as it used to work about 6 months or so ago.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I had to use this udev rule to get my RAID array to assemble and discover the lvm volumes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ACTION==“add”, SUBSYSTEM==“block”, ENV{ID_FS_TYPE}==“ddf_member|isw_raid_member”, RUN+=“/usr/sbin/mdadm --assemble --scan --config=/etc/mdadm.conf”, RUN+=“/usr/sbin/lvm pvscan”, RUN+=“/usr/sbin/lvm vgchange -ay“&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dracut seemed to be getting stuck on detecting DDF metadata when it should have been using IMSM meta data.  Something changed in the way dracut identifies the RAID array and discovers the LVM volumes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More information on the issue has been provided in the forums here:  &lt;a href=&quot;https://forums.rockylinux.org/t/rocky-linux-9-7-wont-boot-post-kernel-upgrade-lvm-dev-rl-nv-root-does-not-exist-boots-fine-on-older-kernel/20103&quot; rel=&quot;noopener&quot;&gt;https://forums.rockylinux.org/t/rocky-linux-9-7-wont-boot-post-kernel-upgrade-lvm-dev-rl-nv-root-does-not-exist-boots-fine-on-older-kernel/20103&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[  201.001156] az dracut-initqueue[680]: Warning: dracut-initqueue: starting timeout scripts&lt;br /&gt;
[  201.531870] az dracut-initqueue[680]: Warning: dracut-initqueue: timeout, still waiting for following initqueue hooks:&lt;br /&gt;
[  201.533263] az dracut-initqueue[680]: Warning: /lib/dracut/hooks/initqueue/finished/devexists-\x2fdev\x2fdisk\x2fby-id\x2fmd-uuid-f1c6208c:90b871a1:d1e22cc3:b7a767f1.sh: &quot;[ -e &quot;/dev/disk/by-id/md-uuid-f1c6208c:90b871a1:d1e22cc3:b7a767f1&quot; ]&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
[  201.534624] az dracut-initqueue[680]: Warning: /lib/dracut/hooks/initqueue/finished/devexists-\x2fdev\x2fdisk\x2fby-id\x2fmd-uuid-f31c4352:b4bff910:3236e82b:1bcd48d5.sh: &quot;[ -e &quot;/dev/disk/by-id/md-uuid-f31c4352:b4bff910:3236e82b:1bcd48d5&quot; ]&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
[  201.535721] az dracut-initqueue[680]: Warning: /lib/dracut/hooks/initqueue/finished/devexists-\x2fdev\x2fmapper\x2frl_nv-root.sh: &quot;if ! grep -q After=remote-fs-pre.target /run/systemd/generator/systemd-cryptsetup@*.service 2&gt;/dev/null; then&lt;br /&gt;
[  201.535721] az dracut-initqueue[680]:     [ -e &quot;/dev/mapper/rl_nv-root&quot; ]&lt;br /&gt;
[  201.535721] az dracut-initqueue[680]: fi&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
[  201.539285] az dracut-initqueue[680]: Warning: /lib/dracut/hooks/initqueue/finished/devexists-\x2fdev\x2frl_nv\x2froot.sh: &quot;[ -e &quot;/dev/rl_nv/root&quot; ]&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
[  201.539285] az dracut-initqueue[680]: Warning: /lib/dracut/hooks/initqueue/finished/devexists-\x2fdev\x2frl_nv\x2fswap.sh: &quot;[ -e &quot;/dev/rl_nv/swap&quot; ]&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
[  201.542192] az dracut-initqueue[680]: Warning: dracut-initqueue: starting timeout scripts&lt;br /&gt;
[  201.542192] az dracut-initqueue[680]: Warning: Could not boot.&lt;br /&gt;
[  201.566498] az systemd[1]: Starting Dracut Emergency Shell...&lt;br /&gt;
[  201.584422] az systemd[1]: Received SIGRTMIN+21 from PID 682 (plymouthd).&lt;br /&gt;
[  201.594483] az systemd[1]: Received SIGRTMIN+21 from PID 682 (plymouthd).&lt;br /&gt;
Warning:  /dev/rl_nv/root does not exist&lt;br /&gt;
Warning:  /dev/rl_nv/swap does not exist]]></description><category>dracut</category><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 18:34:57 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12245</guid><comments>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12245#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>0012244: postfix have remove hash and btree type support but in some case the default config still use  btree type</title><author></author><link>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12244</link><description><![CDATA[sudo postconf |grep -E ' (btree|hash):'&lt;br /&gt;
address_verify_map = btree:$data_directory/verify_cache&lt;br /&gt;
postscreen_cache_map = btree:$data_directory/postscreen_cache&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I you enable address_verify_map function or use for some config file btree type you get this error:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;mailto:root@s-virt-g10&quot;&gt;root@s-virt-g10&lt;/a&gt; tmp]# newaliases&lt;br /&gt;
postalias: warning: unsupported dictionary type: btree. Is the postfix-btree package installed?&lt;br /&gt;
postalias: fatal: unsupported map type: btree&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the package postfix-btree does not exist.]]></description><category>postfix</category><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 18:15:23 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12244</guid><comments>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12244#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>0012112: Raspberry Pi, Rocky Linux 10 image fails to boot on Pi-4 Model B</title><author></author><link>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12112</link><description><![CDATA[The image &quot;Rocky-10-SBC-RaspberryPi.latest.aarch64.raw.xz&quot; available as of 21-Feb-2026 as a download from the Rocky Linux website fails to boot on a Raspberry Pi-4 Model B with 8GB RAM when written to a 32GB SD-card.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At boot the Raspberry boot loader display is presented for approx. 500ms, followed by the colourful, rainbow-like, Raspberry splash screen.  Nothing else is ever shown on the display and RL fails to boot.  The Pi motherboard has two LED's.  Red has continuous illumination, the green flashes seven times, pauses momentarily and then repeats the pattern.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Rocky Linux 10 README for the Raspberry Pi image identifies that it has been tested (and presumably works) with a Pi 4:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;This image is always available at: &lt;a href=&quot;https://dl.rockylinux.org/pub/rocky/10/images/aarch64/Rocky-10-SBC-RaspberryPi.latest.aarch64.raw.xz&quot; rel=&quot;noopener&quot;&gt;https://dl.rockylinux.org/pub/rocky/10/images/aarch64/Rocky-10-SBC-RaspberryPi.latest.aarch64.raw.xz&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
They have been tested on Raspberry Pi 4 and 5.&lt;br /&gt;
Rocky Linux 10 WILL NOT WORK on a Raspberry Pi 1 or 2 (1.1 or earlier) as they are 32-bit only, and Rocky Linux only supports arm64 (aarch64).&lt;br /&gt;
Rocky Linux 10 WILL NOT WORK on a Raspberry Pi 3 due to lack of MBR on the images.&quot;]]></description><category>General</category><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2026 08:33:19 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12112</guid><comments>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12112#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>0012179: Security update for CVE-2025-14104 missing for Rocky 9.7 util-linux package</title><author></author><link>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12179</link><description><![CDATA[The security updates for CVE-2025-14104 were provided as following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- el8: [util-linux-0:2.32.1-48.el8_10] via RHSA-2026:1852 (2026-02-04)  &lt;-- This was made available on 2026-02-05&lt;br /&gt;
- el9: [util-linux-0:2.37.4-21.el9_7] via RHSA-2026:1913 (2026-02-04)   &lt;-- Still missing (not the same as util-linux-0:2.37.4-21.el9)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &lt;a href=&quot;https://errata.rockylinux.org/RLSA-2026:1913&quot; rel=&quot;noopener&quot;&gt;https://errata.rockylinux.org/RLSA-2026:1913&lt;/a&gt; does not appear to denote the correct version for this security update. It references util-linux-0:2.37.4-21.el9 (which was released 2025-05-03 and does not contain the security fix in question (refer to additional information for first 10 lines of changelogs).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can this security update be made available for the Rocky el9.7 release?]]></description><category>util-linux</category><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 16:23:31 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12179</guid><comments>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12179#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>0012178: [Account Services] Data hash table of rotation spam in DMESG</title><author></author><link>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12178</link><description><![CDATA[Please update this package as sometimes it is nearly impossible find info directly in the dmesg&lt;br /&gt;
please refer to &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/afc47ee2af456d12670df862457dcc7f6b864d79&quot; rel=&quot;noopener&quot;&gt;https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/afc47ee2af456d12670df862457dcc7f6b864d79&lt;/a&gt;]]></description><category>BugTracker</category><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 14:29:43 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12178</guid><comments>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12178#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>0011287: cannot update to 9.7 from 9.6</title><author></author><link>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=11287</link><description><![CDATA[I am trying to update from 9.6 to 9.7 and hitting an error which I want to run by you to see if you know it and what the best solution is. I don't understand enough to be able to know where your &quot;try to add&quot; suggestions of --allowerasing, --skip-broken, and/or --nobest is appropriate]]></description><category>General</category><pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2026 01:08:26 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=11287</guid><comments>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=11287#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>0012079: 10.x devel repository mirrors not working</title><author></author><link>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12079</link><description><![CDATA[Enabling the &quot;Devel&quot; repository for 10.0 and 10.x fails. It stopped working sometime in the last couple of months or so.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A similar bug was previously reported for 9.x: &lt;a href=&quot;https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=3268&quot; rel=&quot;noopener&quot;&gt;https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=3268&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that this is in the context of building a custom Docker image within a GitHub Actions workflow, based on rockylinux/rockylinux from Docker Hub.]]></description><category>Mirror Manager</category><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2026 06:57:05 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12079</guid><comments>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12079#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>0012046: Rocky Linux Boot gives text full of squares on the console ( screen ) after the kernel update to Latest ( 4.18.0-553.104.1 )</title><author></author><link>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12046</link><description><![CDATA[We updated the kernel version from kernel-4.18.0-553.97.1.el8_10 to kernel-4.18.0-553.104.1.el8_10.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then, Booting the rocky server gives white squares full on screen for few seconds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please let us know , if this issue is known or tracked , if tracked please give more details on it .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks.]]></description><category>kernel</category><pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2026 18:26:29 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12046</guid><comments>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12046#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>0012013: CVE-2025-7425 missing from Rocky8 errata</title><author></author><link>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12013</link><description><![CDATA[Was fixed some time ago in Redhat 8: &lt;a href=&quot;https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2025-7425&quot; rel=&quot;noopener&quot;&gt;https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2025-7425&lt;/a&gt; (August 2025)&lt;br /&gt;
Rocky 9 has picked up the fix: &lt;a href=&quot;https://errata.rockylinux.org/RLSA-2025:12447&quot; rel=&quot;noopener&quot;&gt;https://errata.rockylinux.org/RLSA-2025:12447&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Current builds show #12 27.72  libxml2                    x86_64 2.9.7-21.el8_10.3            baseos    697 k]]></description><category>libxml2</category><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 05:05:47 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12013</guid><comments>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=12013#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>0011980: On Rocky Linux 9, perl-DBD-MySQL-4.053-1.el9.0.1.x86_64 has a hard runtime dependency on libmysqlclient.so.21</title><author></author><link>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=11980</link><description><![CDATA[On Rocky Linux 9, perl-DBD-MySQL-4.053-1.el9.0.1.x86_64 has a hard runtime dependency on libmysqlclient.so.21 -&lt;br /&gt;
This makes perl-DBD-MySQL incompatible with Percona Server packages - (percona-server-shared) which obsolete mysql-libs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On RHEL 9, perl-DBD-MySQL is available in a build (4.050-13.el9) which uses mariadb-connector-c and does not require libmysqlclient.so.21, and therefore works correctly with Percona Server.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, percona-xtrabackup-84 cannot be installed on Rocky 9 when Percona Server is present, while the same setup works on RHEL 9.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please consider rebuilding perl-DBD-MySQL on Rocky 9 against mariadb-connector-c (as in RHEL), or providing a compatible build as this differs from RHEL spec / behavior.]]></description><category>perl-DBD-MySQL</category><pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2026 20:14:07 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=11980</guid><comments>https://bugs.rockylinux.org/view.php?id=11980#bugnotes</comments></item></channel></rss>
